On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 19:08:53 -0800, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Reiji discovered multiple issues with the vgic_irq series [0]:
> 1. there's an assert that needs fixing.
> 2. some guest arguments are not set correctly.
> 3. the failure test in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check is wrong.
> 4. there are lots of comments that use the wrong formatting.
> 5. vgic_poke_irq() could use a tighter assert check.
>
> [...]
Applied to next, thanks!
[1/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix assert in gicv3_access_reg
commit: cc94d47ce16d4147d546e47c8248e8bd12ba5fe5
[2/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: pass vgic_irq guest args as a pointer
commit: 11024a7a0ac26dd31ddfa0f6590e158bdf9ab858
[3/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix the failure check in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check
commit: 5b7898648f02083012900e48d063e51ccbdad165
[4/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix some vgic related comments
commit: a5cd38fd9c47b23abc6df08d6ee6a71b39038185
[5/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: use a tighter assert in vgic_poke_irq()
commit: b53de63a89244c196d8a2ea76b6754e3fdb4b626
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
