On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 01:22:51PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I find the use of CPACR_EL1_SMEN in some cases and its individual bits > > > in some others pretty confusing. I understand that you have modelled > > > it after the SVE code, but maybe this is a mistake we don't need to > > > repeat. I'd be in favour of directly exposing the individual bits in > > > all cases. > > OK, it is just the KVM code that uses the plain ZEN. I'll add a cleanup > > patch for that at the start of the series for ZEN I guess otherwise it > > looks worse, though that will inflate the size of the series a bit. > I'm happy to merge such a patch early if that helps. That'd be good. There's also similar stuff going on with FPEN BTW (which is I imagine where the SVE stuff came from).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
