On Wed, Jan 12, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022, Chao Gao wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:06:44PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > >On Mon, Dec 27, 2021, Chao Gao wrote:
> > >> No arch implementation uses this opaque now.
> > >
> > >Except for the RISC-V part, this can be a pure revert of commit b99040853738 ("KVM:
> > >Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs"). I think it makes sense
> > >to process it as a revert, with a short blurb in the changelog to note that RISC-V
> > >is manually modified as RISC-V support came along in the interim.
> >
> > commit b99040853738 adds opaque param to kvm_arch_hardware_setup(), which isn't
> > reverted in this patch. I.e., this patch is a partial revert of b99040853738
> > plus manual changes to RISC-V. Given that, "process it as a revert" means
> > clearly say in changelog that this commit contains a partial revert of commit
> > b99040853738 ("KVM: Pass kvm_init()'s opaque param to additional arch funcs").
> >
> > Right?
>
> What I meant is literally do
>
> git revert -s b99040853738
>
> and then manually handle RISC-V.
Doh, to be clear, "manually handle RISC-V _in the same commit_".
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
