Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Add vgic initialization for dirty log perf test for ARM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 21:04:41 +0000,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> For ARM64, if no vgic is setup before the dirty log perf test, the
> userspace irqchip would be used, which would affect the dirty log perf
> test result.

Doesn't it affect *all* performance tests? How much does this change
contributes to the performance numbers you give in the cover letter?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> index 1954b964d1cf..b501338d9430 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@
>  #include "test_util.h"
>  #include "perf_test_util.h"
>  #include "guest_modes.h"
> +#ifdef __aarch64__
> +#include "aarch64/vgic.h"
> +
> +#define GICD_BASE_GPA			0x8000000ULL
> +#define GICR_BASE_GPA			0x80A0000ULL

How did you pick these values?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux