On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 15:53 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 12/10/21 13:25, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-12-09 at 23:34 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > Compared to the review it's missing this hunk: > > > > > > @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ void kvm_gfn_to_pfn_cache_unmap(struct kvm *kvm, struct gfn_to_pfn_cache *gpc) > > > > > > gpc->valid = false; > > > > > > - old_khva = gpc->khva; > > > + old_khva = (void *)((unsigned long)gpc->khva & ~PAGE_MASK); > > > old_dirty = gpc->dirty; > > > > Do you know what? I couldn't bring myself to add that a second time. I > > managed it once, but it made me sad. > > > > Did it like this instead: > > > > - old_khva = gpc->khva; > > + old_khva = gpc->khva - offset_in_page(gpc->khva); > > Very nice, and it would have deserved a macro in include/linux if there > wasn't a decent way to write it. Indeed. I actually went hunting for such, which is where I found offset_in_page(). > > I checked that for me at least, GCC is clever enough to just do the > > mask. > > > > old_khva = gpc->khva - offset_in_page(gpc->khva); > > 131: 48 8b 43 78 mov 0x78(%rbx),%rax > > 135: 48 25 00 f0 ff ff and $0xfffffffffffff000,%rax > > > > > > I still don't see the previous patches in kvm/next — is that an > > automatic push after testing has passed, or is the kernel.org > > infrastructure just *really* slow? > > No, it's me really wanting to send out the -rc5 pull request before the > weekend. Just wait five more minutes. Ack. Thanks.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
