On Thursday 09 Dec 2021 at 10:10:54 (+0000), Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 05:03:55PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > The kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings() function should return true if and only
> > if the host kernel is responsible for creating the hypervisor stage-1
> > mappings. That is only possible in standard non-VHE mode, or during boot
> > in protected nVHE mode. But either way, non of this makes sense in VHE,
> > so make sure to catch this case as well, hence making the function
> > return sensible values in any context (VHE or not).
> >
> > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > index 326cdfec74a1..f8f1096a297f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -239,6 +239,9 @@ void free_hyp_pgds(void)
> >
> > static bool kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings(void)
> > {
> > + if (is_kernel_in_hyp_mode())
> > + return false;
>
> This looks identical to:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211208152300.2478542-7-qperret@xxxxxxxxxx
Yep, I figured it made more sense in the other series as it's not
strictly related to this one, so ... :)
Cheers,
Quentin
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
