Hi Eric,
On 12/7/21 6:22 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
On 12/6/21 11:48 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:44:20PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker<jean-philippe.brucker@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L<yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj<ashok.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan<jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger<eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
This Signed-of-by chain looks dubious, you are the author but the last
one in the chain?
The 1st RFC in Aug 2018
(https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/pipermail/kvmarm/2018-August/032478.html)
said this was a generalization of Jacob's patch
[PATCH v5 01/23] iommu: introduce bind_pasid_table API function
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2018-May/027647.html
So indeed Jacob should be the author. I guess the multiple rebases got
this eventually replaced at some point, which is not an excuse. Please
forgive me for that.
Now the original patch already had this list of SoB so I don't know if I
shall simplify it.
As we have decided to move the nested mode (dual stages) implementation
onto the developing iommufd framework, what's the value of adding this
into iommu core?
Best regards,
baolu
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
