On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:31 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 13 Nov 2021 01:22:26 +0000,
> Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The upcoming patches need a way to detect if the VM, as
> > a whole, has started. Hence, unionize kvm_vcpu_has_run_once()
> > of all the vcpus of the VM and build kvm_vm_has_run_once()
> > to achieve the functionality.
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index b373929c71eb..102e00c0e21c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -1854,4 +1854,6 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > return vcpu->has_run_once;
> > }
> >
> > +bool kvm_vm_has_run_once(struct kvm *kvm);
> > +
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index 1ec8a8e959b2..3d8d96e8f61d 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -4339,6 +4339,23 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_stats_fd(struct kvm *kvm)
> > return fd;
> > }
> >
> > +bool kvm_vm_has_run_once(struct kvm *kvm)
> > +{
> > + int i, ret = false;
> > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> > +
> > + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> > + ret = kvm_vcpu_has_run_once(vcpu);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
>
> This is horribly racy. Nothing prevents a vcpu from running behind
> your back. If you want any sort of guarantee, look at what we do in
> kvm_vgic_create(). Alexandru has patches that extract it to make it
> generally available (at least for arm64).
>
Yes, I looked into kvm_lock_all_vcpus(), but the fact that the series
would call the function with the current vcpu lock held caused me to
back off..
Perhaps I can come up with a similar function, kvm_lock_all_vcpus_except(vcpu) ?
Regards,
Raghavendra
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
