On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 17:58:00 +0000, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:57:32PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Nit: This removes the only user of __sve_save_state() helper. Should we > > > still keep it in fpsimd.S? > > > I was in two minds about that, as I'd like to eventually be able to > > use SVE for protected guests, where the hypervisor itself has to be in > > charge of the FP/SVE save-restore. > > > But that's probably several months away, and I can always revert a > > deletion patch if I need to, so let's get rid of it now. > > While we're on the subject of potential future work we might in future > want to not disable SVE on every syscall if (as seems likely) it turns > out that that's more performant for small vector lengths [...] How are you going to retrofit that into userspace? This would be an ABI change, and I'm not sure how you'd want to deal with that transition... M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
