Re: [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: Use kvm_get_vcpu() instead of open-coded access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/5/21 21:03, Sean Christopherson wrote:
But I think even that is flawed, as APICv can be dynamically deactivated and
re-activated while the VM is running, and I don't see a path that re-updates
the IRTE when APICv is re-activated.  So I think a more conservative check is
needed, e.g.

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c
index 5f81ef092bd4..6cf5b2e86118 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/posted_intr.c
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ int pi_update_irte(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq, uint32_t guest_irq,

         if (!kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(kvm) ||
             !irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP) ||
-           !kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(kvm->vcpus[0]))
+           !irqchip_in_kernel(kvm) || !enable_apicv)
                 return 0;

         idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->irq_srcu);

What happens then if pi_pre_block is called and the IRTE denotes a posted interrupt?

I might be wrong, but it seems to me that you have to change all of the occurrences this way. As soon as enable_apicv is set, you need to go through the POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR just in case.

Paolo

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux