Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM: arm64: Allow guest to set the OSLK bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:47:42PM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 08:31:35PM -0700, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 2:47 AM Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Allow writes to OSLAR and forward the OSLK bit to OSLSR. Change the
> > > reset value of the OSLK bit to 1. Allow the value to be migrated by
> > > making OSLSR_EL1.OSLK writable from userspace.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h |  6 ++++++
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c       | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > > index b268082d67ed..6ba4dc97b69d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > > @@ -127,7 +127,13 @@
> > >  #define SYS_DBGWCRn_EL1(n)             sys_reg(2, 0, 0, n, 7)
> > >  #define SYS_MDRAR_EL1                  sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 0, 0)
> > >  #define SYS_OSLAR_EL1                  sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 0, 4)
> > > +
> > > +#define SYS_OSLAR_OSLK                 BIT(0)
> > > +
> > >  #define SYS_OSLSR_EL1                  sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 1, 4)
> > > +
> > > +#define SYS_OSLSR_OSLK                 BIT(1)
> > > +
> > >  #define SYS_OSDLR_EL1                  sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 3, 4)
> > >  #define SYS_DBGPRCR_EL1                        sys_reg(2, 0, 1, 4, 4)
> > >  #define SYS_DBGCLAIMSET_EL1            sys_reg(2, 0, 7, 8, 6)
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > > index 0326b3df0736..acd8aa2e5a44 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> > > @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@
> > >   * 64bit interface.
> > >   */
> > >
> > > +static int reg_from_user(u64 *val, const void __user *uaddr, u64 id);
> > > +static int reg_to_user(void __user *uaddr, const u64 *val, u64 id);
> > > +static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
> > > +
> > >  static bool read_from_write_only(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > >                                  struct sys_reg_params *params,
> > >                                  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > > @@ -287,6 +291,24 @@ static bool trap_loregion(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > >         return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +static bool trap_oslar_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > +                          struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > > +                          const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > > +{
> > > +       u64 oslsr;
> > > +
> > > +       if (!p->is_write)
> > > +               return read_from_write_only(vcpu, p, r);
> > > +
> > > +       /* Forward the OSLK bit to OSLSR */
> > > +       oslsr = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, OSLSR_EL1) & ~SYS_OSLSR_OSLK;
> > > +       if (p->regval & SYS_OSLAR_OSLK)
> > > +               oslsr |= SYS_OSLSR_OSLK;
> > > +
> > > +       __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, OSLSR_EL1) = oslsr;
> > > +       return true;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static bool trap_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > >                            struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > >                            const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > > @@ -309,9 +331,10 @@ static int set_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
> > >         if (err)
> > >                 return err;
> > >
> > > -       if (val != rd->val)
> > > +       if ((val | SYS_OSLSR_OSLK) != rd->val)
> > >                 return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > +       __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, rd->reg) = val;
> > >         return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -1176,10 +1199,6 @@ static bool access_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > >         return __access_id_reg(vcpu, p, r, true);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static int reg_from_user(u64 *val, const void __user *uaddr, u64 id);
> > > -static int reg_to_user(void __user *uaddr, const u64 *val, u64 id);
> > > -static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
> > > -
> > >  /* Visibility overrides for SVE-specific control registers */
> > >  static unsigned int sve_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > >                                    const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
> > > @@ -1456,8 +1475,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> > >         DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(15),
> > >
> > >         { SYS_DESC(SYS_MDRAR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> > > -       { SYS_DESC(SYS_OSLAR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
> > > -       { SYS_DESC(SYS_OSLSR_EL1), trap_oslsr_el1, reset_val, OSLSR_EL1, 0x00000008,
> > > +       { SYS_DESC(SYS_OSLAR_EL1), trap_oslar_el1 },
> > > +       { SYS_DESC(SYS_OSLSR_EL1), trap_oslsr_el1, reset_val, OSLSR_EL1, 0x0000000A,
> > >                 .set_user = set_oslsr_el1, },
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I assume the reason why you changed the reset value for the
> > register is because Arm ARM says "the On a Cold reset,
> > this field resets to 1".
> > 
> > "4.82 KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT" in Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst says:
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >   - System registers: Reset to their architecturally defined
> >     values as for a warm reset to EL1 (resp. SVC)
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Since Arm ARM doesn't say anything about a warm reset for the field,
> > I would guess the bit doesn't necessarily need to be set.
> 
> That would be great, because it would avoid the migration issue that
> Oliver described in [PATCH v2 4/6]:

Yeah, awesome! Means I can be even lazier and things will "Just Work"
:-)

--
Oliver
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux