On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:08:17AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > KVM/arm64 relies heavily on a bunch of things to be done on the first > run of the vcpu. We also do a bunch of things on PID change. It turns > out that these two things are pretty similar (the first PID change is > also the first run). > > This small series aims at simplifying all that, and to get rid of the > vcpu->arch.has_run_once state. > > Marc Zyngier (5): > KVM: arm64: Move SVE state mapping at HYP to finalize-time > KVM: arm64: Move kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() out of line > KVM: arm64: Merge kvm_arch_vcpu_run_pid_change() and > kvm_vcpu_first_run_init() > KVM: arm64: Restructure the point where has_run_once is advertised Maybe do the restructuring before the merging in order to avoid the potential for bizarre states? > KVM: arm64: Drop vcpu->arch.has_run_once for vcpu->pid > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 +++------ > arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++------------- > arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 11 -------- > arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 11 +++++++- > arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.30.2 > > _______________________________________________ > kvmarm mailing list > kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm > For the series Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, drew _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
