On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 01:05:31 +0100,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Drop arm64's version of the callbacks in favor of the callbacks provided
> by generic KVM, which are semantically identical.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c | 34 ++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c
> index 3e99ac4ab2d6..0b902e0d5b5d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c
> @@ -13,45 +13,15 @@
>
> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_arm_pmu_available);
>
> -static unsigned int kvm_guest_state(void)
> -{
> - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_running_vcpu();
> - unsigned int state;
> -
> - if (!vcpu)
> - return 0;
> -
> - state = PERF_GUEST_ACTIVE;
> - if (!vcpu_mode_priv(vcpu))
> - state |= PERF_GUEST_USER;
> -
> - return state;
> -}
> -
> -static unsigned long kvm_get_guest_ip(void)
> -{
> - struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_running_vcpu();
> -
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!vcpu))
> - return 0;
> -
> - return *vcpu_pc(vcpu);
> -}
> -
> -static struct perf_guest_info_callbacks kvm_guest_cbs = {
> - .state = kvm_guest_state,
> - .get_ip = kvm_get_guest_ip,
> -};
> -
> void kvm_perf_init(void)
> {
> if (kvm_pmu_probe_pmuver() != 0xf && !is_protected_kvm_enabled())
> static_branch_enable(&kvm_arm_pmu_available);
>
> - perf_register_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);
> + kvm_register_perf_callbacks(NULL);
> }
>
> void kvm_perf_teardown(void)
> {
> - perf_unregister_guest_info_callbacks(&kvm_guest_cbs);
> + kvm_unregister_perf_callbacks();
> }
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
