On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 07:16:10PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Assert that the vCPU exits to userspace with KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SUSPEND if
> it correctly executes the SYSTEM_SUSPEND PSCI call. Additionally, assert
> that the guest PSCI call fails if preconditions are not met (more than 1
> running vCPU).
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/psci_test.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/psci_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/psci_test.c
> index 90312be335da..5b881ca4d102 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/psci_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/psci_test.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,16 @@ static uint64_t psci_affinity_info(uint64_t target_affinity,
> return res.a0;
> }
>
> +static uint64_t psci_system_suspend(uint64_t entry_addr, uint64_t context_id)
> +{
> + struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> + smccc_hvc(PSCI_1_0_FN64_SYSTEM_SUSPEND, entry_addr, context_id,
> + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> +
> + return res.a0;
> +}
> +
> static void guest_test_cpu_on(uint64_t target_cpu)
> {
> GUEST_ASSERT(!psci_cpu_on(target_cpu, CPU_ON_ENTRY_ADDR, CPU_ON_CONTEXT_ID));
> @@ -69,6 +79,13 @@ static void vcpu_power_off(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid)
> vcpu_set_mp_state(vm, vcpuid, &mp_state);
> }
>
> +static void guest_test_system_suspend(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t r = psci_system_suspend(CPU_ON_ENTRY_ADDR, CPU_ON_CONTEXT_ID);
> +
> + GUEST_SYNC(r);
> +}
> +
> static struct kvm_vm *setup_vm(void *guest_code)
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
> @@ -136,8 +153,66 @@ static void host_test_cpu_on(void)
> kvm_vm_free(vm);
> }
>
> +static void enable_system_suspend(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> +{
> + struct kvm_enable_cap cap = {
> + .cap = KVM_CAP_ARM_SYSTEM_SUSPEND,
> + };
> +
> + vm_enable_cap(vm, &cap);
> +}
> +
> +static void host_test_system_suspend(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_run *run;
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> +
> + vm = setup_vm(guest_test_system_suspend);
> + enable_system_suspend(vm);
> +
> + vcpu_power_off(vm, VCPU_ID_TARGET);
> + run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID_SOURCE);
> +
> + enter_guest(vm, VCPU_ID_SOURCE);
> +
> + TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT,
> + "Unhandled exit reason: %u (%s)",
> + run->exit_reason, exit_reason_str(run->exit_reason));
> + TEST_ASSERT(run->system_event.type == KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SUSPEND,
> + "Unhandled system event: %u (expected: %u)",
> + run->system_event.type, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SUSPEND);
> +
> + assert_vcpu_reset(vm, VCPU_ID_SOURCE);
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> +}
> +
> +static void host_test_system_suspend_fails(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vm *vm;
> + struct ucall uc;
> +
> + vm = setup_vm(guest_test_system_suspend);
> + enable_system_suspend(vm);
> +
> + enter_guest(vm, VCPU_ID_SOURCE);
> + TEST_ASSERT(get_ucall(vm, VCPU_ID_SOURCE, &uc) == UCALL_SYNC,
> + "Unhandled ucall: %lu", uc.cmd);
> + TEST_ASSERT(uc.args[1] == PSCI_RET_DENIED,
> + "Unrecognized PSCI return code: %lu (expected: %u)",
> + uc.args[1], PSCI_RET_DENIED);
> +
> + kvm_vm_free(vm);
> +}
> +
> int main(void)
> {
> + if (!kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_ARM_SYSTEM_SUSPEND)) {
> + print_skip("KVM_CAP_ARM_SYSTEM_SUSPEND not supported");
> + exit(KSFT_SKIP);
> + }
How about only guarding the new tests with this, so we can still do the
cpu_on test when this feature isn't present?
> +
> host_test_cpu_on();
> + host_test_system_suspend();
> + host_test_system_suspend_fails();
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog
>
Thanks,
drew
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
