Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: arm64: Encapsulate reset request logic in a helper function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 09:10:14AM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:05 PM Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 12:16 PM Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > In its implementation of the PSCI function, KVM needs to request that a
> > > target vCPU resets before its next entry into the guest. Wrap the logic
> > > for requesting a reset in a function for later use by other implemented
> > > PSCI calls.
> > >
> > > No functional change intended.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
> > > index 310b9cb2b32b..bb59b692998b 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/psci.c
> > > @@ -64,9 +64,40 @@ static inline bool kvm_psci_valid_affinity(unsigned long affinity)
> > >         return !(affinity & ~MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK);
> > >  }
> > >
> > > -static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
> > > +static void kvm_psci_vcpu_request_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > > +                                       unsigned long entry_addr,
> > > +                                       unsigned long context_id,
> > > +                                       bool big_endian)
> > >  {
> > >         struct vcpu_reset_state *reset_state;
> > > +
> > > +       lockdep_assert_held(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
> > > +
> > > +       reset_state = &vcpu->arch.reset_state;
> > > +       reset_state->pc = entry_addr;
> > > +
> > > +       /* Propagate caller endianness */
> > > +       reset_state->be = big_endian;
> > > +
> > > +       /*
> > > +        * NOTE: We always update r0 (or x0) because for PSCI v0.1
> > > +        * the general purpose registers are undefined upon CPU_ON.
> > > +        */
> > > +       reset_state->r0 = context_id;
> > > +
> > > +       WRITE_ONCE(reset_state->reset, true);
> > > +       kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_VCPU_RESET, vcpu);
> > > +
> > > +       /*
> > > +        * Make sure the reset request is observed if the change to
> > > +        * power_state is observed.
> > > +        */
> > > +       smp_wmb();
> > > +       vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
> > > +{
> > >         struct kvm *kvm = source_vcpu->kvm;
> > >         struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
> > >         unsigned long cpu_id;
> > > @@ -90,29 +121,9 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
> > >                         return PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS;
> > >         }
> > >
> > > -       reset_state = &vcpu->arch.reset_state;
> > > -
> > > -       reset_state->pc = smccc_get_arg2(source_vcpu);
> > > -
> > > -       /* Propagate caller endianness */
> > > -       reset_state->be = kvm_vcpu_is_be(source_vcpu);
> > > -
> > > -       /*
> > > -        * NOTE: We always update r0 (or x0) because for PSCI v0.1
> > > -        * the general purpose registers are undefined upon CPU_ON.
> > > -        */
> > > -       reset_state->r0 = smccc_get_arg3(source_vcpu);
> > > -
> > > -       WRITE_ONCE(reset_state->reset, true);
> > > -       kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_VCPU_RESET, vcpu);
> > > -
> > > -       /*
> > > -        * Make sure the reset request is observed if the change to
> > > -        * power_state is observed.
> > > -        */
> > > -       smp_wmb();
> > > -
> > > -       vcpu->arch.power_off = false;
> > > +       kvm_psci_vcpu_request_reset(vcpu, smccc_get_arg2(source_vcpu),
> > > +                                   smccc_get_arg3(source_vcpu),
> > > +                                   kvm_vcpu_is_be(source_vcpu));
> > >         kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
> > >
> > >         return PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
> > > --
> > > 2.33.0.685.g46640cef36-goog
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Not directly related to the patch, but the (original) code doesn't
> > do any sanity checking for the entry address although the PSCI spec says:
> >
> > "INVALID_ADDRESS is returned when the entry point address is known
> > by the implementation to be invalid, because it is in a range that
> > is known not to be available to the caller."
> 
> Right, I had noticed the same but was a tad too lazy to address in
> this series :) Thanks for the review, Reji!
>

KVM doesn't reserve any subrange within [0 - max_ipa), afaik. So all
we need to do is check 'entry_addr < max_ipa', right?

Thanks,
drew

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux