Hi Ricardo, On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 01:49:18 +0100, Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Verify that the redistributor regions do not extend beyond the > VM-specified IPA size (phys_size). This can happen when using > KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST or KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGIONS > with: > > base + size > phys_size AND base < phys_size > > Add the missing check into vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region() which is called > when setting the regions, and into vgic_v3_check_base() which is called > when attempting the first vcpu-run. The vcpu-run check does not apply to > KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGIONS because the regions size is known > before the first vcpu-run. Finally, this patch also enables some extra > tests in vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region() by calculating "size" early for > the legacy redist api. > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 7 ++++++- > arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 4 ++++ > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c > index a09cdc0b953c..055671bede85 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c > @@ -796,7 +796,9 @@ static int vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region(struct kvm *kvm, uint32_t index, > struct vgic_dist *d = &kvm->arch.vgic; > struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg; > struct list_head *rd_regions = &d->rd_regions; > - size_t size = count * KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE; > + int nr_vcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus); > + size_t size = count ? count * KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE : > + nr_vcpus * KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE; > int ret; > > /* cross the end of memory ? */ > @@ -834,6 +836,9 @@ static int vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region(struct kvm *kvm, uint32_t index, > if (vgic_v3_rdist_overlap(kvm, base, size)) > return -EINVAL; > > + if (base + size > kvm_phys_size(kvm)) > + return -E2BIG; > + > rdreg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdreg), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!rdreg) > return -ENOMEM; > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c > index 66004f61cd83..5afd9f6f68f6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c > @@ -512,6 +512,10 @@ bool vgic_v3_check_base(struct kvm *kvm) > if (rdreg->base + vgic_v3_rd_region_size(kvm, rdreg) < > rdreg->base) > return false; > + > + if (rdreg->base + vgic_v3_rd_region_size(kvm, rdreg) > > + kvm_phys_size(kvm)) > + return false; > } > > if (IS_VGIC_ADDR_UNDEF(d->vgic_dist_base)) How about vgic-v2? From what I can see, the placement of the distributor and CPU interface should be subjected to the same checks (see vgic_v2_check_base()). Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
