On Wednesday 28 Jul 2021 at 15:32:31 (+0000), David Brazdil wrote:
> Hyp checks whether an address range only covers RAM by checking the
> start/endpoints against a list of memblock_region structs. However,
> the endpoint here is exclusive but internally is treated as inclusive.
> Fix the off-by-one error that caused valid address ranges to be
> rejected.
>
> Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 90134ac9cabb6 ("KVM: arm64: Protect the .hyp sections from the host")
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> index d938ce95d3bd..a6ce991b1467 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/mem_protect.c
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static bool range_is_memory(u64 start, u64 end)
> {
> struct kvm_mem_range r1, r2;
>
> - if (!find_mem_range(start, &r1) || !find_mem_range(end, &r2))
> + if (!find_mem_range(start, &r1) || !find_mem_range(end - 1, &r2))
> return false;
> if (r1.start != r2.start)
> return false;
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Quentin
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
