On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 17:56:59 +0100, Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 05:19:03PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 17:07:40 +0100, > > Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 06, 2021, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > This is becoming a bit messy. I'd rather drop the whole series from > > > > -next, and get something that doesn't break in the middle. Please > > > > resend the series tested on top of -rc4. > > > > > > That'd be my preference too. I almost asked if it could be (temporarily) > > > dropped, but I assumed the hashes in -next are intended to be stable. > > > > I usually try and keep these commits stable. > > > > But in this case, we end-up with a broken build at some point in the > > series. For such cases, I'm more than happy to drop the series and > > merge a clean version again (I keep each series on a separate branch > > for this exact purpose). > > Thank you both. I will send a new series with the fix and Seans > suggestions (tested on the latest rc). > > Apologies again for the mess. No worries, that's a pretty common situation. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
