On Tuesday 01 Jun 2021 at 15:38:22 (+0100), Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 13:51:30 +0100,
> Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Pages that are available for allocation are tracked in free-lists, so we use
> > + * the pages themselves to store the list nodes to avoid wasting space. As the
> > + * allocator always returns zeroed pages (which are zeroed on the hyp_put_page()
> > + * path to optimize allocation speed), we also need to clean-up the list node in
> > + * each page when we take it out of the list.
> > + */
> > +static inline void page_remove_from_list(struct hyp_page *p)
> > +{
> > + struct list_head *node = (struct list_head *)hyp_page_to_virt(p);
>
> Nit: How about changing hyp_page_to_virt() so that it returns a
> convenient 'void *', and get rid of the ugly casts?
It should already return void *, but I kind of liked the explicit cast
here for documentation purpose. We're turning a 'random' piece of unused
memory into a typed object, so that felt like a useful annotation. Happy
to get rid of it though.
> > +
> > + __list_del_entry(node);
> > + memset(node, 0, sizeof(*node));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void page_add_to_list(struct hyp_page *p, struct list_head *head)
> > +{
> > + struct list_head *node = (struct list_head *)hyp_page_to_virt(p);
> > +
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(node);
> > + list_add_tail(node, head);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct hyp_page *node_to_page(struct list_head *node)
> > +{
> > + return (struct hyp_page *)hyp_virt_to_page(node);
>
> Why is this cast necessary? If I'm not mistaken, hyp_vmemmap is
> already cast as a 'struct hyp_page *', so hyp_virt_to_page() should
> return the same type.
Right, that one is totally unnecessary, I'll remove.
Cheers,
Quentin
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
