On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 07:08:59PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > > On 2021/4/27 14:23, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 11:26:38PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > > > On 2021/4/26 13:20, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 03:51:56PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > > > > > On 2021/4/25 15:19, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 04:11:16PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I tested this patchset(plus arm32 change, like arm64 does) > > > > > based on lts 5.10，add some debug log, the useful info shows > > > > > below, if we enable HOLES_IN_ZONE, no panic, any idea, > > > > > thanks. > > > > > > > > > > Are there any changes on top of 5.10 except for pfn_valid() patch? > > > > > Do you see this panic on 5.10 without the changes? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, there are some BSP support for arm board based on 5.10, > > Is it possible to test 5.12? Do you use SPARSMEM? If yes, what is your section size? What is the value if CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER in your configuration? -- Sincerely yours, Mike. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
