On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 02:56:16PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:49:01 +0100, > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > > > The perf_num_counters() function is only defined when CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS > > is enabled: > > > > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c: In function 'kvm_perf_init': > > arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters'; did you mean 'dec_mm_counter'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > 58 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0 > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > Use conditional compilation to disable this feature entirely when > > CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS is disabled in the host. > > > > Fixes: 6b5b368fccd7 ("KVM: arm64: Turn kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() into a static key") > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Not sure if this is the correct symbol to check for, but this is > > one way to avoid the build failure. > > I think a better way is to get rid of perf_num_counters() entirely, > see [1]. If someone acks the second and last patches, I'll even take > the whole series in (nudge nudge...). Sorry, behind at the moment! Will get to it today. Will _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm