Re: [PATCH kvmtool v2 13/22] hw/serial: Refactor trap handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andre,

On 2/25/21 12:59 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> With the planned retirement of the special ioport emulation code, we
> need to provide an emulation function compatible with the MMIO prototype.
>
> Adjust the trap handler to use that new function, and provide shims to
> implement the old ioport interface, for now.
>
> We drop the usage of ioport__read8/write8 entirely, as this would only
> be applicable for I/O port accesses, and does nothing for 8-bit wide
> accesses anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  hw/serial.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/serial.c b/hw/serial.c
> index b0465d99..c495eac1 100644
> --- a/hw/serial.c
> +++ b/hw/serial.c
> @@ -242,36 +242,31 @@ void serial8250__inject_sysrq(struct kvm *kvm, char sysrq)
>  	sysrq_pending = sysrq;
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
> -			   void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_out(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			   u16 offset, u8 data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
> -	char *addr = data;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_TX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB) {
> -			dev->dll = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dll = data;
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		/* Loopback mode */
>  		if (dev->mcr & UART_MCR_LOOP) {
>  			if (dev->rxcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = *addr;
> +				dev->rxbuf[dev->rxcnt++] = data;
>  				dev->lsr |= UART_LSR_DR;
>  			}
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (dev->txcnt < FIFO_LEN) {
> -			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = *addr;
> +			dev->txbuf[dev->txcnt++] = data;
>  			dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_TEMT;
>  			if (dev->txcnt == FIFO_LEN / 2)
>  				dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_THRE;
> @@ -283,18 +278,18 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (!(dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB))
> -			dev->ier = ioport__read8(data) & 0x0f;
> +			dev->ier = data & 0x0f;
>  		else
> -			dev->dlm = ioport__read8(data);
> +			dev->dlm = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_FCR:
> -		dev->fcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->fcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		dev->lcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->lcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		dev->mcr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->mcr = data;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
>  		/* Factory test */
> @@ -303,7 +298,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  		/* Not used */
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		dev->scr = ioport__read8(data);
> +		dev->scr = data;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -317,7 +312,7 @@ static bool serial8250_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
> +static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, u8 *data)
>  {
>  	if (dev->rxdone == dev->rxcnt)
>  		return;
> @@ -325,57 +320,54 @@ static void serial8250_rx(struct serial8250_device *dev, void *data)
>  	/* Break issued ? */
>  	if (dev->lsr & UART_LSR_BI) {
>  		dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_BI;
> -		ioport__write8(data, 0);
> +		*data = 0;
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	ioport__write8(data, dev->rxbuf[dev->rxdone++]);
> +	*data = dev->rxbuf[dev->rxdone++];
>  	if (dev->rxcnt == dev->rxdone) {
>  		dev->lsr &= ~UART_LSR_DR;
>  		dev->rxcnt = dev->rxdone = 0;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +static bool serial8250_in(struct serial8250_device *dev, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +			  u16 offset, u8 *data)
>  {
> -	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> -	u16 offset;
>  	bool ret = true;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>  
> -	offset = port - dev->iobase;
> -
>  	switch (offset) {
>  	case UART_RX:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dll);
> +			*data = dev->dll;
>  		else
>  			serial8250_rx(dev, data);
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IER:
>  		if (dev->lcr & UART_LCR_DLAB)
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->dlm);
> +			*data = dev->dlm;
>  		else
> -			ioport__write8(data, dev->ier);
> +			*data = dev->ier;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_IIR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS);
> +		*data = dev->iir | UART_IIR_TYPE_BITS;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lcr);
> +		*data = dev->lcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->mcr);
> +		*data = dev->mcr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_LSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->lsr);
> +		*data = dev->lsr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_MSR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->msr);
> +		*data = dev->msr;
>  		break;
>  	case UART_SCR:
> -		ioport__write8(data, dev->scr);
> +		*data = dev->scr;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = false;
> @@ -389,6 +381,37 @@ static bool serial8250_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port,
>  	return ret;
>  }

I'm not sure about replacing ioport_{read,write}8 with pointer dereferencing. They
are functionally equivalent because big-endian and little-endian are about the
order of bytes in memory, not the order of bits, but I don't think the change
makes much sense because:

1. All the other emulated devices use the ioport accessors, even in the case of 8
bit accesses. For example, the RTC device uses ioport accessors and it too is
converted in the end to a MMIO device, just like serial.

2. The patch is about refactoring the emulation callbacks, other (non-trivial)
changes should be a separate patch.

Please let me know if it's something that I'm missing. Other than this change, the
patch looks good.

Thanks,

Alex

>  
> +static void serial8250_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> +			    u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ptr;
> +
> +	if (is_write)
> +		serial8250_out(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, *data);
> +	else
> +		serial8250_in(dev, vcpu, addr - dev->iobase, data);
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				  u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, data, 1, true, dev);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool serial8250_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> +				 u16 port, void *data, int size)
> +{
> +	struct serial8250_device *dev = ioport->priv;
> +
> +	serial8250_mmio(vcpu, port, data, 1, false, dev);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
>  
>  char *fdt_stdout_path = NULL;
> @@ -427,8 +450,8 @@ void serial8250_generate_fdt_node(void *fdt, struct device_header *dev_hdr,
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct ioport_operations serial8250_ops = {
> -	.io_in			= serial8250_in,
> -	.io_out			= serial8250_out,
> +	.io_in			= serial8250_ioport_in,
> +	.io_out			= serial8250_ioport_out,
>  };
>  
>  static int serial8250__device_init(struct kvm *kvm,
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux