Hi Andre,
On 2/25/21 12:59 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> With the planned retirement of the special ioport emulation code, we
> need to provide an emulation function compatible with the MMIO prototype.
>
> Adjust the I/O port trap handler to use that new function, and provide
> shims to implement the old ioport interface, for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> vfio/core.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/vfio/core.c b/vfio/core.c
> index 0b45e78b..ddd3c2c7 100644
> --- a/vfio/core.c
> +++ b/vfio/core.c
> @@ -81,15 +81,12 @@ out_free_buf:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static bool vfio_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> - u16 port, void *data, int len)
> +static bool _vfio_ioport_in(struct vfio_region *region, u32 offset,
> + void *data, int len)
> {
> - u32 val;
> - ssize_t nr;
> - struct vfio_region *region = ioport->priv;
> struct vfio_device *vdev = region->vdev;
> -
> - u32 offset = port - region->port_base;
> + ssize_t nr;
> + u32 val;
>
> if (!(region->info.flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_READ))
> return false;
> @@ -97,7 +94,7 @@ static bool vfio_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> nr = pread(vdev->fd, &val, len, region->info.offset + offset);
> if (nr != len) {
> vfio_dev_err(vdev, "could not read %d bytes from I/O port 0x%x\n",
> - len, port);
> + len, offset + region->port_base);
> return false;
> }
>
> @@ -118,15 +115,13 @@ static bool vfio_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static bool vfio_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> - u16 port, void *data, int len)
> +static bool _vfio_ioport_out(struct vfio_region *region, u32 offset,
> + void *data, int len)
> {
> - u32 val;
> - ssize_t nr;
> - struct vfio_region *region = ioport->priv;
> struct vfio_device *vdev = region->vdev;
> + ssize_t nr;
> + u32 val;
>
> - u32 offset = port - region->port_base;
>
> if (!(region->info.flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE))
> return false;
> @@ -148,11 +143,37 @@ static bool vfio_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> nr = pwrite(vdev->fd, &val, len, region->info.offset + offset);
> if (nr != len)
> vfio_dev_err(vdev, "could not write %d bytes to I/O port 0x%x",
> - len, port);
> + len, offset + region->port_base);
>
> return nr == len;
> }
>
> +static void vfio_ioport_mmio(struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u64 addr, u8 *data, u32 len,
> + u8 is_write, void *ptr)
> +{
> + struct vfio_region *region = ptr;
> + u32 offset = addr - region->port_base;
> +
> + if (is_write)
> + _vfio_ioport_out(region, offset, data, len);
> + else
> + _vfio_ioport_in(region, offset, data, len);
> +}
> +
> +static bool vfio_ioport_out(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> + u16 port, void *data, int len)
> +{
> + vfio_ioport_mmio(vcpu, port, data, len, true, ioport->priv);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool vfio_ioport_in(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu,
> + u16 port, void *data, int len)
> +{
> + vfio_ioport_mmio(vcpu, port, data, len, false, ioport->priv);
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static struct ioport_operations vfio_ioport_ops = {
> .io_in = vfio_ioport_in,
> .io_out = vfio_ioport_out,
The new code looks functionally identical to the old one:
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Alex
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
