Re: [PATCH kvmtool 03/21] ioport: Retire .generate_fdt_node functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andre,

On 2/17/21 3:54 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:05:27 +0000
> Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> The ioport routines support a special way of registering FDT node
>>> generator functions. There is no reason to have this separate from the
>>> already existing way via the device header.
>>>
>>> Now that the only user of this special ioport variety has been
>>> transferred, we can retire this code, to simplify ioport handling.  
>> One comment below, but otherwise very nice cleanup.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  include/kvm/ioport.h |  4 ----
>>>  ioport.c             | 34 ----------------------------------
>>>  2 files changed, 38 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/kvm/ioport.h b/include/kvm/ioport.h
>>> index d0213541..a61038e2 100644
>>> --- a/include/kvm/ioport.h
>>> +++ b/include/kvm/ioport.h
>>> @@ -29,10 +29,6 @@ struct ioport {
>>>  struct ioport_operations {
>>>  	bool (*io_in)(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size);
>>>  	bool (*io_out)(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size);
>>> -	void (*generate_fdt_node)(struct ioport *ioport, void *fdt,
>>> -				  void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
>>> -							    u8 irq,
>>> -							    enum irq_type));
>>>  };
>>>  
>>>  void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq);
>>> diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c
>>> index 667e8386..b98836d3 100644
>>> --- a/ioport.c
>>> +++ b/ioport.c
>>> @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static struct ioport *ioport_get(struct rb_root *root, u64 addr)
>>>  /* Called with ioport_lock held. */
>>>  static void ioport_unregister(struct rb_root *root, struct ioport *data)
>>>  {
>>> -	device__unregister(&data->dev_hdr);
>>>  	ioport_remove(root, data);
>>>  	free(data);
>>>  }
>>> @@ -70,30 +69,6 @@ static void ioport_put(struct rb_root *root, struct ioport *data)
>>>  	mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
>>> -static void generate_ioport_fdt_node(void *fdt,
>>> -				     struct device_header *dev_hdr,
>>> -				     void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
>>> -							       u8 irq,
>>> -							       enum irq_type))
>>> -{
>>> -	struct ioport *ioport = container_of(dev_hdr, struct ioport, dev_hdr);
>>> -	struct ioport_operations *ops = ioport->ops;
>>> -
>>> -	if (ops->generate_fdt_node)
>>> -		ops->generate_fdt_node(ioport, fdt, generate_irq_prop);
>>> -}
>>> -#else
>>> -static void generate_ioport_fdt_node(void *fdt,
>>> -				     struct device_header *dev_hdr,
>>> -				     void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
>>> -							       u8 irq,
>>> -							       enum irq_type))
>>> -{
>>> -	die("Unable to generate device tree nodes without libfdt\n");
>>> -}
>>> -#endif
>>> -
>>>  int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, int count, void *param)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct ioport *entry;
>>> @@ -107,10 +82,6 @@ int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, i
>>>  		.node		= RB_INT_INIT(port, port + count),
>>>  		.ops		= ops,
>>>  		.priv		= param,
>>> -		.dev_hdr	= (struct device_header) {
>>> -			.bus_type	= DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT,
>>> -			.data		= generate_ioport_fdt_node,
>>> -		},  
>> Since the dev_hdr field is not used anymore, maybe it could also be removed from
>> struct ioport in include/kvm/ioport.h?
> I could (seems to indeed still work without it), but this whole
> structure will go away with a later patch, so I didn't bother so far.
> That's why I am not sure it's useful to do this at this point then.

Yes, you're totally right, no need to fiddle too much with it now because it will
removed later:

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,

Alex

>
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
>>>  		/*
>>>  		 * Start from 0 because ioport__unregister() doesn't decrement
>>>  		 * the reference count.
>>> @@ -123,15 +94,10 @@ int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, i
>>>  	r = ioport_insert(&ioport_tree, entry);
>>>  	if (r < 0)
>>>  		goto out_free;
>>> -	r = device__register(&entry->dev_hdr);
>>> -	if (r < 0)
>>> -		goto out_remove;
>>>  	mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>>>  
>>>  	return port;
>>>  
>>> -out_remove:
>>> -	ioport_remove(&ioport_tree, entry);
>>>  out_free:
>>>  	free(entry);
>>>  	mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);  
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux