Hi Andre,
On 2/17/21 3:54 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:05:27 +0000
> Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andre,
>>
>> On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> The ioport routines support a special way of registering FDT node
>>> generator functions. There is no reason to have this separate from the
>>> already existing way via the device header.
>>>
>>> Now that the only user of this special ioport variety has been
>>> transferred, we can retire this code, to simplify ioport handling.
>> One comment below, but otherwise very nice cleanup.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> include/kvm/ioport.h | 4 ----
>>> ioport.c | 34 ----------------------------------
>>> 2 files changed, 38 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/kvm/ioport.h b/include/kvm/ioport.h
>>> index d0213541..a61038e2 100644
>>> --- a/include/kvm/ioport.h
>>> +++ b/include/kvm/ioport.h
>>> @@ -29,10 +29,6 @@ struct ioport {
>>> struct ioport_operations {
>>> bool (*io_in)(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size);
>>> bool (*io_out)(struct ioport *ioport, struct kvm_cpu *vcpu, u16 port, void *data, int size);
>>> - void (*generate_fdt_node)(struct ioport *ioport, void *fdt,
>>> - void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
>>> - u8 irq,
>>> - enum irq_type));
>>> };
>>>
>>> void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq);
>>> diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c
>>> index 667e8386..b98836d3 100644
>>> --- a/ioport.c
>>> +++ b/ioport.c
>>> @@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static struct ioport *ioport_get(struct rb_root *root, u64 addr)
>>> /* Called with ioport_lock held. */
>>> static void ioport_unregister(struct rb_root *root, struct ioport *data)
>>> {
>>> - device__unregister(&data->dev_hdr);
>>> ioport_remove(root, data);
>>> free(data);
>>> }
>>> @@ -70,30 +69,6 @@ static void ioport_put(struct rb_root *root, struct ioport *data)
>>> mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_LIBFDT
>>> -static void generate_ioport_fdt_node(void *fdt,
>>> - struct device_header *dev_hdr,
>>> - void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
>>> - u8 irq,
>>> - enum irq_type))
>>> -{
>>> - struct ioport *ioport = container_of(dev_hdr, struct ioport, dev_hdr);
>>> - struct ioport_operations *ops = ioport->ops;
>>> -
>>> - if (ops->generate_fdt_node)
>>> - ops->generate_fdt_node(ioport, fdt, generate_irq_prop);
>>> -}
>>> -#else
>>> -static void generate_ioport_fdt_node(void *fdt,
>>> - struct device_header *dev_hdr,
>>> - void (*generate_irq_prop)(void *fdt,
>>> - u8 irq,
>>> - enum irq_type))
>>> -{
>>> - die("Unable to generate device tree nodes without libfdt\n");
>>> -}
>>> -#endif
>>> -
>>> int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, int count, void *param)
>>> {
>>> struct ioport *entry;
>>> @@ -107,10 +82,6 @@ int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, i
>>> .node = RB_INT_INIT(port, port + count),
>>> .ops = ops,
>>> .priv = param,
>>> - .dev_hdr = (struct device_header) {
>>> - .bus_type = DEVICE_BUS_IOPORT,
>>> - .data = generate_ioport_fdt_node,
>>> - },
>> Since the dev_hdr field is not used anymore, maybe it could also be removed from
>> struct ioport in include/kvm/ioport.h?
> I could (seems to indeed still work without it), but this whole
> structure will go away with a later patch, so I didn't bother so far.
> That's why I am not sure it's useful to do this at this point then.
Yes, you're totally right, no need to fiddle too much with it now because it will
removed later:
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Alex
>
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
>>> /*
>>> * Start from 0 because ioport__unregister() doesn't decrement
>>> * the reference count.
>>> @@ -123,15 +94,10 @@ int ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, i
>>> r = ioport_insert(&ioport_tree, entry);
>>> if (r < 0)
>>> goto out_free;
>>> - r = device__register(&entry->dev_hdr);
>>> - if (r < 0)
>>> - goto out_remove;
>>> mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
>>>
>>> return port;
>>>
>>> -out_remove:
>>> - ioport_remove(&ioport_tree, entry);
>>> out_free:
>>> free(entry);
>>> mutex_unlock(&ioport_lock);
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
