On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:05:39 +0000,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 15:59:05 +0000
> Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
> > index b47df73e98d7..530562eb09fd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
> > @@ -14,17 +14,50 @@
> > #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> > #include <asm/esr.h>
> >
> > +static void pend_sync_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + vcpu->arch.flags |= (KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_SYNC |
> > + KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION);
> > +
> > + /* If not nesting, EL1 is the only possible exception target */
> > + if (likely(!nested_virt_in_use(vcpu))) {
>
> This breaks compilation for the next 14 patches, because
> nested_virt_in_use() is unknown here. Patch 23/66 fixes this by adding
> kvm_nested.h to kvm_emulate.h.
Indeed, well caught.
> Shall we do this already in this patch here, or pull in kvm_nested.h in
> every C file we use nested_virt_in_use(), like exception.c above?
I've just added kvm_nested.h in the two places that were required at
this stage (and verified that it all bisects correctly now).
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
