Hi Eric,
On 2020/11/16 19:00, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch adds the VFIO_IOMMU_SET_MSI_BINDING ioctl which aim
> to (un)register the guest MSI binding to the host. This latter
> then can use those stage 1 bindings to build a nested stage
> binding targeting the physical MSIs.
[...]
> +static int vfio_iommu_type1_set_msi_binding(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_set_msi_binding msi_binding;
> + unsigned long minsz;
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_set_msi_binding,
> + size);
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&msi_binding, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (msi_binding.argsz < minsz)
> + return -EINVAL;
We can check BIND and UNBIND are not set simultaneously, just like VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE.
> +
> + if (msi_binding.flags == VFIO_IOMMU_UNBIND_MSI) {
> + vfio_unbind_msi(iommu, msi_binding.iova);
> + ret = 0;
> + } else if (msi_binding.flags == VFIO_IOMMU_BIND_MSI) {
> + ret = vfio_bind_msi(iommu, msi_binding.iova,
> + msi_binding.gpa, msi_binding.size);
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
Thanks,
Keqian
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
