In smp_call_function_single(), the 3rd parameter isn't the return value
and it's always positive. But it may return a negative value. So the
'ret' is should be the return value of the smp_call_function_single().
In check_kvm_target_cpu(), 'phys_target' is more readable than 'ret'.
Signed-off-by: Yejune Deng <yejune.deng@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 04c44853b103..5fa5c04106de 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -1815,9 +1815,9 @@ static int init_hyp_mode(void)
return err;
}
-static void check_kvm_target_cpu(void *ret)
+static void check_kvm_target_cpu(void *phys_target)
{
- *(int *)ret = kvm_target_cpu();
+ *(int *)phys_target = kvm_target_cpu();
}
struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr)
@@ -1879,7 +1879,7 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
{
int err;
- int ret, cpu;
+ int ret, cpu, phys_target;
bool in_hyp_mode;
if (!is_hyp_mode_available()) {
@@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque)
"Only trusted guests should be used on this system.\n");
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- smp_call_function_single(cpu, check_kvm_target_cpu, &ret, 1);
+ ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, check_kvm_target_cpu, &phys_target, 1);
if (ret < 0) {
kvm_err("Error, CPU %d not supported!\n", cpu);
return -ENODEV;
--
2.29.0
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
