On 2021/1/15 18:23, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:53:07PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>> When align the end address, ought to use its original value.
>>
>> Fixes: b1e57de62cfb ("KVM: arm64: Add stand-alone page-table walker infrastructure")
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
>> index bdf8e55ed308..670b0ef12440 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
>> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ int kvm_pgtable_walk(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
>> struct kvm_pgtable_walk_data walk_data = {
>> .pgt = pgt,
>> .addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PAGE_SIZE),
>> - .end = PAGE_ALIGN(walk_data.addr + size),
>> + .end = PAGE_ALIGN(addr + size),
>> .walker = walker,
>
> Hmm, this is a change in behaviour, no (consider the case where both 'addr'
> and 'size' are misaligned)? The current code is consistent with the
> kerneldoc in asm/kvm_pgtable.h, so I don't see the motivation to change it.
>
> Did you hit a bug somewhere?
>
> Will
> .
>
Not hit a bug, I just read the code to implement a new idea of stage2 DBM
support [1]. Yes, according to doc, this is not an issue ("The offset of
@addr within a page is ignored."). Sorry to disturb ;-).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/fd26654b-8258-061c-2a69-90b961c1c71b@xxxxxxxxxx/
Thanks,
Keqian
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
