Hi Eric, > -----Original Message----- > From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 14 January 2021 16:58 > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx>; > Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@xxxxxxxxxx>; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; > wangxingang <wangxingang5@xxxxxxxxxx>; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > maz@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; vivek.gautam@xxxxxxx; > iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; qubingbing <qubingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; > Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx; > eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx; will@xxxxxxxxxx; kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > robin.murphy@xxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with > unmanaged ASIDs > > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, > > On 12/4/20 11:23 AM, Auger Eric wrote: > > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, > > > > On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > >> Hi Jean, > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx] > >>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 > >>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>; wangxingang > >>> <wangxingang5@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@xxxxxxxxxx>; > >>> kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; maz@xxxxxxxxxx; joro@xxxxxxxxxx; > will@xxxxxxxxxx; > >>> iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >>> vivek.gautam@xxxxxxx; alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx; > >>> zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx; > >>> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eric.auger.pro@xxxxxxxxx; Zengtao (B) > >>> <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; qubingbing <qubingbing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation > with > >>> unmanaged ASIDs > >>> > >>> Hi Shameer, > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > wrote: > >>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei, > >>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related > >>> patches > >>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin > of > >>> Eric's series? > >>>> Please share your thoughts. > >>> > >>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches > >>> based on mainline? > >> > >> Yes. > >> > >> The uacce-devel branches from > >>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment > >>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch > >>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) > As I plan to respin shortly, please could you confirm the best branch to > rebase on still is that one (uacce-devel from the linux-kernel-uadk git > repo). Is it up to date? Commits seem to be quite old there. I think it is the uacce-devel-5.11 branch, but will wait for Jean or Zhangfei to confirm. Thanks, Shameer > Thanks > > Eric > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Hi Eric, > >> > >> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make > sense > >> to rebase on top of either of those? > >> > >> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. > > > > Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-) > > > > Thanks > > > > Eric > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Shameer > >> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Jean > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > iommu mailing list > > iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu > > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
