From: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
We will soon need to synchronise multiple CPUs in the hyp text at EL2.
The qspinlock-based locking used by the host is overkill for this purpose
and relies on the kernel's "percpu" implementation for the MCS nodes.
Implement a simple ticket locking scheme based heavily on the code removed
by commit c11090474d70 ("arm64: locking: Replace ticket lock implementation
with qspinlock").
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7584c397bbac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * A stand-alone ticket spinlock implementation for use by the non-VHE
+ * KVM hypervisor code running at EL2.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC
+ * Author: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * Heavily based on the implementation removed by c11090474d70 which was:
+ * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ARM64_KVM_NVHE_SPINLOCK_H__
+#define __ARM64_KVM_NVHE_SPINLOCK_H__
+
+#include <asm/alternative.h>
+#include <asm/lse.h>
+
+typedef union hyp_spinlock {
+ u32 __val;
+ struct {
+#ifdef __AARCH64EB__
+ u16 next, owner;
+#else
+ u16 owner, next;
+ };
+#endif
+} hyp_spinlock_t;
+
+#define hyp_spin_lock_init(l) \
+do { \
+ *(l) = (hyp_spinlock_t){ .__val = 0 }; \
+} while (0)
+
+static inline void hyp_spin_lock(hyp_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ u32 tmp;
+ hyp_spinlock_t lockval, newval;
+
+ asm volatile(
+ /* Atomically increment the next ticket. */
+ ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN(
+ /* LL/SC */
+" prfm pstl1strm, %3\n"
+"1: ldaxr %w0, %3\n"
+" add %w1, %w0, #(1 << 16)\n"
+" stxr %w2, %w1, %3\n"
+" cbnz %w2, 1b\n",
+ /* LSE atomics */
+" mov %w2, #(1 << 16)\n"
+" ldadda %w2, %w0, %3\n"
+ __nops(3))
+
+ /* Did we get the lock? */
+" eor %w1, %w0, %w0, ror #16\n"
+" cbz %w1, 3f\n"
+ /*
+ * No: spin on the owner. Send a local event to avoid missing an
+ * unlock before the exclusive load.
+ */
+" sevl\n"
+"2: wfe\n"
+" ldaxrh %w2, %4\n"
+" eor %w1, %w2, %w0, lsr #16\n"
+" cbnz %w1, 2b\n"
+ /* We got the lock. Critical section starts here. */
+"3:"
+ : "=&r" (lockval), "=&r" (newval), "=&r" (tmp), "+Q" (*lock)
+ : "Q" (lock->owner)
+ : "memory");
+}
+
+static inline void hyp_spin_unlock(hyp_spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+ u64 tmp;
+
+ asm volatile(
+ ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN(
+ /* LL/SC */
+ " ldrh %w1, %0\n"
+ " add %w1, %w1, #1\n"
+ " stlrh %w1, %0",
+ /* LSE atomics */
+ " mov %w1, #1\n"
+ " staddlh %w1, %0\n"
+ __nops(1))
+ : "=Q" (lock->owner), "=&r" (tmp)
+ :
+ : "memory");
+}
+
+#endif /* __ARM64_KVM_NVHE_SPINLOCK_H__ */
--
2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
