Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Fix hyp_cpu_pm_{init,exit} __init annotation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:08:54PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> The __init annotations on hyp_cpu_pm_{init,exit} are obviously incorrect,
> and the build system shouts at you if you enable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH.
> 
> Nothing really bad happens as we never execute that code outside of the
> init context, but we can't label the callers as __int either, as kvm_init
> isn't __init itself. Oh well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 6e637d2b4cfb..71a49eae9ea0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -1574,12 +1574,12 @@ static struct notifier_block hyp_init_cpu_pm_nb = {
>  	.notifier_call = hyp_init_cpu_pm_notifier,
>  };
>  
> -static void __init hyp_cpu_pm_init(void)
> +static void hyp_cpu_pm_init(void)
>  {
>  	if (!is_protected_kvm_enabled())
>  		cpu_pm_register_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_pm_nb);
>  }
> -static void __init hyp_cpu_pm_exit(void)
> +static void hyp_cpu_pm_exit(void)
>  {
>  	if (!is_protected_kvm_enabled())
>  		cpu_pm_unregister_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_pm_nb);
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux