On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 05:28:38PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:54:01PM +0000, David Brazdil wrote: > > CPU index should never be negative. Change the signature of > > (set_)cpu_logical_map to take an unsigned int. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Is there a function problem here, or is this just cleanup from > inspection? > > Core code including the cpuhp_*() callbacks uses an int, so if there's a > strong justification to change this, it suggests there's some treewide > cleanup that should be done. > > I don't have strong feelings on the matter, but I'd like to understand > the rationale. Yeah, it's a mess. Marc and I felt that using a uint was less error-prone wrt bounds checks. If this gets an int, it still works and only checking the upper bound is required. Does that make sense? David _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
