On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:43:01 +0000,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Small refactor so that nVHE's handle_trap uses a switch on the Exception
> Class value of ESR_EL2 in preparation for adding a handler of SMC32/64.
nit: SMC32 seems to be a leftover from the previous version.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> index 411b0f652417..19332c20fcde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> @@ -16,9 +16,9 @@
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_nvhe_init_params, kvm_init_params);
>
> -static void handle_host_hcall(unsigned long func_id,
> - struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> +static void handle_host_hcall(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> {
> + unsigned long func_id = host_ctxt->regs.regs[0];
> unsigned long ret = 0;
>
> switch (func_id) {
> @@ -109,11 +109,12 @@ static void handle_host_hcall(unsigned long func_id,
> void handle_trap(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> {
> u64 esr = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ESR);
> - unsigned long func_id;
>
> - if (ESR_ELx_EC(esr) != ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64)
> + switch (ESR_ELx_EC(esr)) {
> + case ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64:
> + handle_host_hcall(host_ctxt);
> + break;
> + default:
> hyp_panic();
> -
> - func_id = host_ctxt->regs.regs[0];
> - handle_host_hcall(func_id, host_ctxt);
> + }
> }
> --
> 2.29.2.299.gdc1121823c-goog
>
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
