From: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@xxxxxxxxxx> When setting the forwarding path of a VLPI, it is more consistent to also transfer the pending state from irq->pending_latch to VPT (especially in migration, the pending states of VLPIs are restored into kvm’s vgic first). And we currently send "INT+VSYNC" to trigger a VLPI to pending. Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Shenming Lu <lushenming@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c index b5fa73c9fd35..cc3ab9cea182 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v4.c @@ -418,6 +418,18 @@ int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int virq, irq->host_irq = virq; atomic_inc(&map.vpe->vlpi_count); + /* Transfer pending state */ + ret = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq, + IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, + irq->pending_latch); + WARN_RATELIMIT(ret, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq); + + /* + * Let it be pruned from ap_list later and don't bother + * the List Register. + */ + irq->pending_latch = false; + out: mutex_unlock(&its->its_lock); return ret; -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
