On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 12:16 PM Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Introduce early_init_dt_add_memory_hyp() to allow KVM to conserve a copy
> of the memory regions parsed from DT. This will be needed in the context
> of the protected nVHE feature of KVM/arm64 where the code running at EL2
> will be cleanly separated from the host kernel during boot, and will
> need its own representation of memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/of/fdt.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> index 4602e467ca8b..af2b5a09c5b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> @@ -1099,6 +1099,10 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_chosen(unsigned long node, const char *uname,
> #define MAX_MEMBLOCK_ADDR ((phys_addr_t)~0)
> #endif
>
> +void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_hyp(u64 base, u64 size)
> +{
> +}
> +
> void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
> {
> const u64 phys_offset = MIN_MEMBLOCK_ADDR;
> @@ -1139,6 +1143,7 @@ void __init __weak early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(u64 base, u64 size)
> base = phys_offset;
> }
> memblock_add(base, size);
> + early_init_dt_add_memory_hyp(base, size);
Can this be done right after we add all the memblocks using the
memblock API? I thought EFI would also need to be handled, but looks
like it just calls early_init_dt_add_memory_arch(). That's odd
especially for ACPI systems...
I don't really like putting what looks like an arm64 only hook here,
but then I don't want an arm64 version of
early_init_dt_add_memory_arch() either. We're almost to the point of
getting rid of the arch specific ones. But I don't have a better
suggestion currently.
Rob
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
