Re: [PATCH 03/11] KVM: arm64: Make kvm_skip_instr() and co private to HYP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/26/20 1:34 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
In an effort to remove the vcpu PC manipulations from EL1 on nVHE
systems, move kvm_skip_instr() to be HYP-specific. EL1's intent
to increment PC post emulation is now signalled via a flag in the
vcpu structure.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h       | 27 +----------
  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |  1 +
  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c               |  6 +--
  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/switch.h    |  2 +
  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c           |  3 ++
  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c   |  2 +
  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v3-sr.c            |  2 +
  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vhe/switch.c            |  3 ++
  arch/arm64/kvm/mmio.c                      |  2 +-
  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                       |  2 +-
  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c                  |  2 +-
  12 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 0864f425547d..6d2b5d1aa7b3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -472,32 +472,9 @@ static inline unsigned long vcpu_data_host_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
  	return data;		/* Leave LE untouched */
  }
-static __always_inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static __always_inline void kvm_incr_pc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  {
-	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
-		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu);
-	} else {
-		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
-		*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~PSR_BTYPE_MASK;
-	}
-
-	/* advance the singlestep state machine */
-	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
-}
-
-/*
- * Skip an instruction which has been emulated at hyp while most guest sysregs
- * are live.
- */
-static __always_inline void __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
-	vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
-
-	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
-
-	write_sysreg_el2(vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate, SYS_SPSR);
-	write_sysreg_el2(*vcpu_pc(vcpu), SYS_ELR);
+	vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
  }
#endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 0aecbab6a7fb..9a75de3ad8da 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -406,6 +406,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
  #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE		(1 << 5) /* SVE exposed to guest */
  #define KVM_ARM64_VCPU_SVE_FINALIZED	(1 << 6) /* SVE config completed */
  #define KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_PTRAUTH	(1 << 7) /* PTRAUTH exposed to guest */
+#define KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC		(1 << 8) /* Increment PC */
#define vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) (system_supports_sve() && \
  			    ((vcpu)->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_GUEST_HAS_SVE))
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
index 30bf8e22df54..d4e00a864ee6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  	 * otherwise return to the same address...
  	 */
  	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
-	kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+	kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
  	return 1;
  }
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  		kvm_clear_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu);
  	}
- kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+	kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
return 1;
  }
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int handle_trap_exceptions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  	 * that fail their condition code check"
  	 */
  	if (!kvm_condition_valid(vcpu)) {
-		kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+		kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
  		handled = 1;
  	} else {
  		exit_handle_fn exit_handler;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4ecaf5cb2633
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/hyp/adjust_pc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Guest PC manipulation helpers
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2012,2013 - ARM Ltd
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 - Google LLC
+ * Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ARM64_KVM_HYP_ADJUST_PC_H__
+#define __ARM64_KVM_HYP_ADJUST_PC_H__
+
+#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_host.h>
+
+static inline void kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
+		kvm_skip_instr32(vcpu);
+	} else {
+		*vcpu_pc(vcpu) += 4;
+		*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~PSR_BTYPE_MASK;
+	}
+
+	/* advance the singlestep state machine */
+	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) &= ~DBG_SPSR_SS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Skip an instruction which has been emulated at hyp while most guest sysregs
+ * are live.
+ */
+static inline void __kvm_skip_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_ELR);
+	vcpu_gp_regs(vcpu)->pstate = read_sysreg_el2(SYS_SPSR);
+
+	__kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);

Did you mean kvm_skip_instr() instead ?

Suzuki
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux