Hi Andrew,
Thank you for having a look at this.
On 9/21/20 3:17 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:08:38PM +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
>> Update the description of the PMU KVM_{GET, SET}_DEVICE_ATTR error codes
>> to be a better match for the code that returns them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst
>> index 96d6cf77cb1e..5b8db30c61db 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/vcpu.rst
>> @@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ Returns:
>> ======= ========================================================
>> -EBUSY The PMU overflow interrupt is already set
>> -EFAULT Error reading interrupt number
>> - -ENXIO The overflow interrupt not set when attempting to get it
>> - -ENODEV PMUv3 not supported
>> + -ENXIO PMUv3 not supported
> I think -ENXIO matched the code better before the change.
KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR for KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ returns -ENXIO if
CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU is not set (in include/kvm/arm_pmu.h).
But I think I understand what you mean, you're referring to
kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(), which returns -ENXIO if the irq number was not set. I
can change the description to "PMUv3 not supported or the overflow interrupt not
set when attempting to get it", what do you think?
Thanks,
Alex
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
