Hi Marc,
On 9/8/20 9:58 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> It can be desirable to expose a PMU to a guest, and yet not want the
> guest to be able to count some of the implemented events (because this
> would give information on shared resources, for example.
>
> For this, let's extend the PMUv3 device API, and offer a way to setup a
> bitmap of the allowed events (the default being no bitmap, and thus no
> filtering).
>
> Userspace can thus allow/deny ranges of event. The default policy
> depends on the "polarity" of the first filter setup (default deny if the
> filter allows events, and default allow if the filter denies events).
> This allows to setup exactly what is allowed for a given guest.
>
> Note that although the ioctl is per-vcpu, the map of allowed events is
> global to the VM (it can be setup from any vcpu until the vcpu PMU is
> initialized).
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 +++
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 16 +++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 6cd60be69c28..1e64260b7e2b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct kvm_arch {
> */
> bool return_nisv_io_abort_to_user;
>
> + /*
> + * VM-wide PMU filter, implemented as a bitmap and big enough for
> + * up to 2^10 events (ARMv8.0) or 2^16 events (ARMv8.1+).
> + */
> + unsigned long *pmu_filter;
> unsigned int pmuver;
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index ba85bb23f060..7b1511d6ce44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -159,6 +159,21 @@ struct kvm_sync_regs {
> struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> };
>
> +/*
> + * PMU filter structure. Describe a range of events with a particular
> + * action. To be used with KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER.
> + */
> +struct kvm_pmu_event_filter {
> + __u16 base_event;
> + __u16 nevents;
> +
> +#define KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW 0
> +#define KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY 1
> +
> + __u8 action;
> + __u8 pad[3];
> +};
> +
> /* for KVM_GET/SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
> struct kvm_vcpu_events {
> struct {
> @@ -329,6 +344,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_events {
> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL 0
> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ 0
> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT 1
> +#define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER 2
> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_CTRL 1
> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_IRQ_VTIMER 0
> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_TIMER_IRQ_PTIMER 1
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 691d21e4c717..0f11d0009c17 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> int i;
>
> + bitmap_free(kvm->arch.pmu_filter);
> +
> kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);
>
> for (i = 0; i < KVM_MAX_VCPUS; ++i) {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> index 8a5f65763814..67a731bafbc9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ static u32 kvm_pmu_event_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
> case 6: /* ARMv8.5 */
> return GENMASK(15, 0);
> default: /* Shouldn't be there, just for sanity */
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "Unknown PMU version %d\n", kvm->arch.pmuver);
rather belongs to previous patch
> return 0;
> }
> }
> @@ -592,11 +593,21 @@ static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> data = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
>
> kvm_pmu_stop_counter(vcpu, pmc);
> - eventsel = data & kvm_pmu_event_mask(vcpu->kvm);;
> + if (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> + eventsel = ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES;
So from a filter pov the cycle counter is assimilated to the event
counter CPU_CYCLES event (0x11). I see there are some differences
between PMCCNTR and 0x11 counting (wrt PMCR, ...) though. Shouldn't we
mention the cycle counter is getting filtered as well
> + else
> + eventsel = data & kvm_pmu_event_mask(vcpu->kvm);
> +
> + /* Software increment event doesn't need to be backed by a perf event */
> + if (eventsel == ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR)
> + return;
>
> - /* Software increment event does't need to be backed by a perf event */
> - if (eventsel == ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR &&
> - pmc->idx != ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> + /*
> + * If we have a filter in place and that the event isn't allowed, do
> + * not install a perf event either.
> + */
> + if (vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter &&
> + !test_bit(eventsel, vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter))
> return;
>
> memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(struct perf_event_attr));
> @@ -608,8 +619,7 @@ static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> attr.exclude_kernel = data & ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL1 ? 1 : 0;
> attr.exclude_hv = 1; /* Don't count EL2 events */
> attr.exclude_host = 1; /* Don't count host events */
> - attr.config = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX) ?
> - ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES : eventsel;
> + attr.config = eventsel;
>
> counter = kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(vcpu, pmc);
>
> @@ -892,6 +902,53 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num = irq;
> return 0;
> }
> + case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER: {
> + struct kvm_pmu_event_filter __user *uaddr;
> + struct kvm_pmu_event_filter filter;
> + int nr_events;
> +
> + nr_events = kvm_pmu_event_mask(vcpu->kvm) + 1;
> +
> + uaddr = (struct kvm_pmu_event_filter __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&filter, uaddr, sizeof(filter)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (((u32)filter.base_event + filter.nevents) > nr_events ||
> + (filter.action != KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW &&
> + filter.action != KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
> +
> + if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter) {
> + vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter = bitmap_alloc(nr_events, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter) {
> + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * The default depends on the first applied filter.
> + * If it allows events, the default is to deny.
> + * Conversely, if the first filter denies a set of
> + * events, the default is to allow.
> + */
> + if (filter.action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW)
> + bitmap_zero(vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter, nr_events);
> + else
> + bitmap_fill(vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter, nr_events);
> + }
> +
> + if (filter.action == KVM_PMU_EVENT_ALLOW)
> + bitmap_set(vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter, filter.base_event, filter.nevents);
> + else
> + bitmap_clear(vcpu->kvm->arch.pmu_filter, filter.base_event, filter.nevents);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
> return kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(vcpu);
> }
> @@ -928,6 +985,7 @@ int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> switch (attr->attr) {
> case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ:
> case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
> + case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER:
> if (kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() &&
> test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> return 0;
>
Thanks
Eric
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
