On Sat, 05 Sep 2020 04:56:39 +0100, Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > On 9/4/20 8:07 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 2020-09-04 01:51, Gavin Shan wrote: > >> On 9/3/20 10:16 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > >>> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 09:48:18PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote: > >>>> On 9/3/20 9:13 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: > >>>>> On 9/3/20 5:34 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: > >>>>>> On 8/25/20 7:39 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > > [...] > > >> > >> Since the the following changes have been folded to v4, I reran the test cases > >> on v4 and everything works fine. > > > > Thanks a lot for the great testing and reviewing effort! > > > > <shameless ask> > > Since you obviously have a test rig setup for this: does your TX2 support 16kB > > pages? If so, could you please do another run with this page size on the host? > > </shameless ask> > > > > My TX2 machine doesn't support 16KB page size unfortunately. The > following output was seen from host when it has 16KB page size. > Sorry about it. > > CONFIG_ARM64_PAGE_SHIFT=14 > CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS_47=y > CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS=47 > > Output from console on host > =========================== > EFI stub: ERROR: This 16 KB granular kernel is not supported by your CPU > > Failed to boot both default and fallback entries. > > Press any key to continue... Ah, fair enough. It was worth trying. I guess I need to try that on TX1, which does support 16kB pages. Too bad it is such a pain to use... Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
