On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 16:25:52 +0100
Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In order to allow more than just GIC implementations in the future,
> let's move the GIC model outside of the distributor. This also
> allows us to back irqchip_in_kernel() with its own irqchip type
> (IRQCHIP_USER), removing another field from the distributor.
>
> New helpers are provided as a convenience.
Patch looks fine to me. One observation inline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_irq.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-debug.c | 5 +++--
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c | 10 ++++------
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 5 -----
> 9 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_irq.h
>
...
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> index 76e2d85789ed..c6fdb1222453 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpuif = &vgic_cpu->vgic_v3;
> - u32 model = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model;
> + bool is_v3 = irqchip_is_gic_v3(vcpu->kvm);
> int lr;
>
> DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> cpuid = val & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID;
> cpuid >>= GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT;
>
> - if (model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3) {
> + if (is_v3) {
> intid = val & ICH_LR_VIRTUAL_ID_MASK;
> } else {
> intid = val & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
> @@ -117,12 +117,11 @@ void vgic_v3_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Requires the irq to be locked already */
> void vgic_v3_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, int lr)
> {
> - u32 model = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model;
> + bool is_v2 = irqchip_is_gic_v2(vcpu->kvm);
> u64 val = irq->intid;
> bool allow_pending = true, is_v2_sgi;
>
> - is_v2_sgi = (vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid) &&
> - model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2);
> + is_v2_sgi = (vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid) && is_v2);
>
> if (irq->active) {
> val |= ICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT;
> @@ -163,8 +162,7 @@ void vgic_v3_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq, int lr)
> if (irq->config == VGIC_CONFIG_EDGE)
> irq->pending_latch = false;
>
> - if (vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid) &&
> - model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2) {
> + if (vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid) && is_v2) {
Clearly its true in the original code, but I'm not sure why we
have a local variable for is_v2_sgi above, but don't use it here.
Looks like it might just be because is_v2_sgi was introduced
as part of a bug fix that didn't go near this block of code?
> u32 src = ffs(irq->source);
>
> if (WARN_RATELIMIT(!src, "No SGI source for INTID %d\n",
> @@ -205,10 +203,9 @@ void vgic_v3_clear_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int lr)
> void vgic_v3_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcrp)
> {
> struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> - u32 model = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model;
> u32 vmcr;
>
> - if (model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2) {
> + if (irqchip_is_gic_v2(vcpu->kvm)) {
> vmcr = (vmcrp->ackctl << ICH_VMCR_ACK_CTL_SHIFT) &
> ICH_VMCR_ACK_CTL_MASK;
> vmcr |= (vmcrp->fiqen << ICH_VMCR_FIQ_EN_SHIFT) &
> @@ -235,12 +232,11 @@ void vgic_v3_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcrp)
> void vgic_v3_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcrp)
> {
> struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *cpu_if = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> - u32 model = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model;
> u32 vmcr;
>
> vmcr = cpu_if->vgic_vmcr;
>
> - if (model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2) {
> + if (irqchip_is_gic_v2(vcpu->kvm)) {
> vmcrp->ackctl = (vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ACK_CTL_MASK) >>
> ICH_VMCR_ACK_CTL_SHIFT;
> vmcrp->fiqen = (vmcr & ICH_VMCR_FIQ_EN_MASK) >>
> @@ -285,7 +281,7 @@ void vgic_v3_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * Also, we don't support any form of IRQ/FIQ bypass.
> * This goes with the spec allowing the value to be RAO/WI.
> */
> - if (vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3) {
> + if (irqchip_is_gic_v3(vcpu->kvm)) {
> vgic_v3->vgic_sre = (ICC_SRE_EL1_DIB |
> ICC_SRE_EL1_DFB |
> ICC_SRE_EL1_SRE);
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
