On 2020-08-19 13:50, Andrew Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:05:58PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
v2:
- ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_FEATURES now also returns
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED
when steal time is not supported
- Added READ_ONCE() for the run_delay read
- Reworked kvm_put/get_guest to not require type as a parameter
- Added some more text to the documentation for KVM_CAP_STEAL_TIME
- Enough changed that I didn't pick up Steven's r-b's
The first four patches in the series are fixes that come from testing
and reviewing pvtime code while writing the QEMU support[*]. The last
patch is only a convenience for userspace, and I wouldn't be
heartbroken
if it wasn't deemed worth it. The QEMU patches are currently written
without the cap. However, if the cap is accepted, then I'll change the
QEMU code to use it.
Thanks,
drew
[*]
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg03856.html
(a v2 of this series will also be posted shortly)
Andrew Jones (6):
KVM: arm64: pvtime: steal-time is only supported when configured
KVM: arm64: pvtime: Fix potential loss of stolen time
KVM: arm64: Drop type input from kvm_put_guest
KVM: arm64: pvtime: Fix stolen time accounting across migration
KVM: Documentation: Minor fixups
arm64/x86: KVM: Introduce steal-time cap
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 3 +++
arch/arm64/kvm/pvtime.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +++
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 31
++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
7 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--
2.25.4
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
Hi Marc,
Gentle ping. I'd like to to switch the QEMU code to using the proposed
KVM cap, if the cap is accepted.
I'm fine with it. To be honest, this series is mostly fixes, except
for that last patch.
Paolo, are you OK with me sending the whole thing as fixes, including
the UAPI patch? At least we'd have something consistent for 5.9.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
