On 2020-08-18 11:16, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 08:31:08AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 11/08/20 12:27, Will Deacon wrote:
> Will Deacon (2):
> KVM: Pass MMU notifier range flags to kvm_unmap_hva_range()
> KVM: arm64: Only reschedule if MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE is not set
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> arch/mips/kvm/mmu.c | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 3 ++-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu_host.c | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 3 ++-
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 ++-
> 10 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
These would be okay for 5.9 too, so I plan to queue them myself before
we fork for 5.10.
Thanks, Paolo. Let me know if you want me to rebase/repost.
Please note that I'm planning on rewriting most of the arm64 KVM
page-table
code for 5.10, so if you can get this series in early (e.g. for -rc2),
then
it would _really_ help with managing the kvm/arm64 queue for the next
merge
window.
Otherwise, could you and Marc please set up a shared branch with just
these,
so I can use it as a base?
Please let me know.
Given that this doesn't directly applies to -rc1, I'll push out a branch
shortly with the conflicts resolved.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
