On 2020-07-11 11:04, Andrew Jones wrote:
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
It'd be good to have an actual commit message.
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
index 320788f81a05..3bd96c1a3962 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
@@ -6122,7 +6122,7 @@ HvCallSendSyntheticClusterIpi,
HvCallSendSyntheticClusterIpiEx.
8.21 KVM_CAP_HYPERV_DIRECT_TLBFLUSH
-----------------------------------
-:Architecture: x86
+:Architectures: x86
This capability indicates that KVM running on top of Hyper-V
hypervisor
enables Direct TLB flush for its guests meaning that TLB flush
@@ -6135,16 +6135,17 @@ in CPUID and only exposes Hyper-V
identification. In this case, guest
thinks it's running on Hyper-V and only use Hyper-V hypercalls.
8.22 KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS
+-----------------------------
-Architectures: s390
+:Architectures: s390
This capability indicates that the KVM_S390_NORMAL_RESET and
KVM_S390_CLEAR_RESET ioctls are available.
8.23 KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED
+---------------------------
-Architecture: s390
-
+:Architectures: s390
This capability indicates that the Ultravisor has been initialized and
KVM can therefore start protected VMs.
But this seems to be an otherwise unrelated patch.
I'm happy to take it, but it seems odd here.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
