Hi,
On 7/6/20 1:54 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Now that we have a wrapper for the sysreg accesses, let's use that
> consistently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
> index e329a36b2bee..e503caff14d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
> @@ -109,12 +109,10 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> local_irq_save(flags);
>
> if (vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_FP_ENABLED) {
> - u64 *guest_zcr = &vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[ZCR_EL1];
> -
> fpsimd_save_and_flush_cpu_state();
>
> if (guest_has_sve)
> - *guest_zcr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ZCR_EL12);
> + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, ZCR_EL1) = read_sysreg_s(SYS_ZCR_EL12);
> } else if (host_has_sve) {
> /*
> * The FPSIMD/SVE state in the CPU has not been touched, and we
Looks fine to me, it's a good change:
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Alex
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
