On 7/2/2020 5:17 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-07-02 10:02, Jingyi Wang wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 7/2/2020 4:22 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-07-02 04:01, Jingyi Wang wrote:
If gicv4.1(sgi hardware injection) supported, we test ipi injection
via hw/sw way separately.
nit: active-less SGIs are not strictly a feature of GICv4.1 (you could
imagine a GIC emulation offering the same thing). Furthermore, GICv4.1
isn't as such visible to the guest itself (it only sees a GICv3).
Thanks,
M.
Yes, but to measure the performance difference of hw/sw SGI injection,
do you think it is acceptable to make it visible to guest and let it
switch SGI injection mode?
It is of course acceptable. I simply object to the "GICv4.1" description.
M.
Okay, maybe description like "GICv4.1 supported kvm" is better.
Thanks,
Jingyi
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
