On 20/04/20 19:12, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> >> >> - trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, waited, vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu)); >> + trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, !block_check, >> vcpu_valid_wakeup(vcpu)); > > This looks like a change in the semantics of the tracepoint. Before > this change, 'waited' would have been true if the vcpu waited at all. > Here, you'd have false if it has been interrupted by a signal, even > if the vcpu has waited for a period of time. True, good catch. Perhaps add macros prepare_to_rcuwait and finish_rcuwait? Paolo _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
