On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 06:17:49PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > This is a respin of Andrew Murray's series to enable support for 64-bit > counters as introduced in ARMv8.5. > > I've given this a spin on (ARMv8.2) hardware, to test that there are no > regressions, but I have not had the chance to test in an ARMv8.5 model (which I > beleive Andrew had previously tested). > > Since v5 [1]: > * Don't treat perfmon ID fields as signed > * Fix up ID field names > * Explicitly compare ARMV8.5 PMU value I'm betting on your issue being a model bug, so I've queued this on top of Robin's enable/disable rework. Please take a look at for-next/perf [1] in case I screwed it up. Thanks, Will [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/perf _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
