On 2020-03-02 10:48, Eric Auger wrote:
commit 3837407c1aa1 upstream.
The specification says PMSWINC increments PMEVCNTR<n>_EL1 by 1
if PMEVCNTR<n>_EL0 is enabled and configured to count SW_INCR.
For PMEVCNTR<n>_EL0 to be enabled, we need both PMCNTENSET to
be set for the corresponding event counter but we also need
the PMCR.E bit to be set.
Fixes: 7a0adc7064b8 ("arm64: KVM: Add access handler for PMSWINC
register")
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.9 and 4.14 only
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
This is a backport of 3837407c1aa1 ("KVM: arm64: pmu: Don't
increment SW_INCR if PMCR.E is unset") which did not apply on
4.9-stable and 4.14-stable trees. Compared to the original patch
__vcpu_sys_reg() is replaced by vcpu_sys_reg().
v1 -> v2:
- this patch also is candidate for 4.9-stable
---
virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
index 69ccce308458..9a47b0cfb01d 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
@@ -299,6 +299,9 @@ void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu, u64 val)
if (val == 0)
return;
+ if (!(vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E))
+ return;
+
enable = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX; i++) {
if (!(val & BIT(i)))
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
