On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:22:58PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On 19.02.2020 0:07, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>
> >Use the with_address() variant to when performing a TLB flush for a
> ^^ is it really needed here?
Doh, thanks. The subject also has a typo, it should be "range-based", not
"ranged-based".
> >specific memslot via kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(), i.e. when
> >flushing after clearing dirty bits during KVM_{GET,CLEAR}_DIRTY_LOG.
> >This aligns all dirty log memslot-specific TLB flushes to use the
> >with_address() variant and paves the way for consolidating the relevant
> >code.
> >
> >Note, moving to the with_address() variant only affects functionality
> >when running as a HyperV guest.
> >
> >Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
