On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:19:18PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > .align 11 > > > > -ENTRY(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs_start) > > > > +SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs) > > > > +SYM_INNER_LABEL(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs_start, SYM_L_GLOBAL) > > > Why isn't SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN enough? And what is the rational for > > The _start and _end labels that were there before are explicitly > > referenced by code, removing them would break the build. > But if we're going to clean things up, I'd rather we actually do that. > The only time __bp_harden_hyp_vecs_end is used is when computing the > size of the vectors, and that'd better be BP_HARDEN_EL2_SLOTS * 2kB > (which can be statically asserted at compile time). I just realized that the same structure is also being used for __smccc_workaround_1_smc which doesn't have such an obviously fixed size - am I missing something with that one? I'll take a look at it anyway.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
